BLADAM 2.0[?]: Life, Liberty, Love and Stuff
DISCLAIMER: This is my personal blog. The blatherings here aren't (necessarily) the views of the current company I work for, companies I've previously blessed with my presence, my loving parents, the Illuminati, or anyone other than me, me, me!

It’s not sex, dammit!


I was just reading an issue of the magazine Psychology Today and was surprised to notice an article named something like, "Sex and Autism."

That's pretty strange, I thought. People are catching the disease of autism from unprotected sex? Or people who don't get enough sex are more prone to becoming autistic? Or have sex may result in a child who may or may not be autistic (related headline: "Eating may lead to obesity")?Actually, it was none of the above. The article actually was discussing how autism relates to GENDER.

Gender. Gender. Gender! Is that such a difficult word for the scientists and journalists to use? It's much more specific and straightforward than "sex," and certainly prone to fewer doubletakes and misunderstandings.

Really, I know it may seem petty, but as someone interested in social science and psychology issues among other things, I'm sick and tired of reading news stories and journal articles talking about "sex" when they should be using the word "gender." And I'm annoyed (okay, and disappointed) when I see an Web page titled "Sex in the classroom" and there aren't any pictures of naked college students.

So what's the deal here? Why are even some highly esteemed medical journals using the word "sex" instead of "gender" when there's such a possibility for confusion AND the latter word carries so much less unnecessary baggage? Am I missing something obvious here, or are a hell of a lot of writers just friggin' clueless?

Yes, I know that historically the word sex was used in prestigious social science and medical journals and such to refer to one's gender. But new words enter our lexicon and often rightly replace older, more ambiguous or charged words. Witness "rape." It used to refer not only to a forcible sexual assault, but also a generic kidnapping (which, I might add, certainly leads to some confusion and horrific expressions when some people see the older musical "The Fantasticks" for their first time, in which there's a song about a harmless kidnapping called "The Rape Ballet.")

So what's the deal with "sex"? And is it just me, or are others annoyed as well by the whole issue?

Then again, maybe I just need to get laid.
 

- Blathered by Adam on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 at 14:08 [ Permalink | Trackback ]
- Filed under Society
- Commented on by 3 folks so far. Scroll down and see for yourself (and join in the conversation!)


fuck you!

- Posted on Saturday, January 31, 2004 at 8:11 [ Permalink to this comment ]

My! The hostility, jinnseibakuchi! Never has so much hostility been so poignantly phrased in two, monosyllabic words.

An interesting history behind our little word, “fuck”. Back in Anglo-Saxon times, “Fuck” “Piss” and “Shit” were as commonplace words in olde England as “Dog” “Cat” and “WMD.”

Then when the Normans conquered England in the late 1100’s, they went about “normanizing” the English. One of the best ways to do this was by replacing commonplace words with their Norman counterparts, thus “Fuck” became “fornicate”, “Piss” became “urinate”, and “Shit” became “Defecate”. Pretty good story huh?

Of course, you realize I’m being a smart-ass by giving you this unwarranted semantics history lesson. But I figure its a bit more tasteful than replying, “Fuck you and the shittin’ horse you rode in on!” But that’s just me! :-D

- Posted on Saturday, January 31, 2004 at 8:44 [ Permalink to this comment ]

I think he has the wrong “fuck” for this entry. wink

- Posted on Saturday, January 31, 2004 at 13:22 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Say something! If you're a member, log in first, though :-).
Name (Required)   Email (Optional)
Please include at least your first name or a nickname Only I, Adam, will see this. It's not posted!

Location or affiliation (Optional) URL (Optional)
e.g., Mannheim, Germany or Microsoft
or Seattle Savoy Club, etc.

Tags supported: <a href>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <strike>, <strong>, <pre>, <code>, and <blockquote>
Pop-up smiley chooser

I warmly welcome you to register and reserve your nickname.

While non-members are welcome to comment freely here, members get nifty benefits and more prominently displayed comments.

Signing up is free, super-fast and painless. No rude invasive questions or evil spam!

Register now or learn more :)

Remember my personal information (it'll be pre-filled for future comments here)
Send me an e-mail when others comment

IMPORTANT: Please type in the word adam below:
(This is to thwart automated spambots; sorry for the inconvenience)


A live preview of your comments will appear below as you type (including supported HTML but not showing graphical-smileys).

Next entry: What was Disney thinking?
Previous entry: And when I sit around the house, I really sit AROUND the house
FEEDS: Full-text, all categories:
Add to your My Yahoo! page Subscribe with Bloglines title= title= Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Subscribe in Rojo Add to Google
(See a complete list of category-specific and other BLADAM feeds!)
CREDITS:Site powered by ExpressionEngine. Cool menus by the Ultimate Dropdown Menu. Thoughtful advice and assistance from Ingmar, LisaJill, other awesome EE forum volunteers, and nice friends.
COPYRIGHT: My sites are the result of many hours of hard work. Kindly ask before using my content. Thanks! :)
[ Return to the top of the page]