BLADAM 2.0[?]: Life, Liberty, Love and Stuff
DISCLAIMER: This is my personal blog. The blatherings here aren't (necessarily) the views of the current company I work for, companies I've previously blessed with my presence, my loving parents, the Illuminati, or anyone other than me, me, me!

Google puzzle for you (win an iPod Photo!)


Note the search results here and here.

1) [EASY]: What oddness do you notice when you compare the results pages?
2) [HARD]: What might explain the situation?

I should have a definitive and official answer for you within a week.

In the meantime, post your guesses below!

[And to the person with the best guess -- most accurate, most entertaining, whatever -- I'll provide you with a genuine photo of an Apple Ipod! :D]

UPDATED 6/5/2005
The puzzle is now, well, broken. But for the original answer, see my entry here smile
 

- Blathered by Adam on Friday, May 6, 2005 at 19:44 [ Permalink | Trackback ]
- Filed under GeekeryGoogle
- Commented on by 9 folks so far. Scroll down and see for yourself (and join in the conversation!)


Heh.  Adwords goodness!  I presume you managed to snatch space up in the bidding war for mere pennies.  Either that or you co-opted somebody at Googleyland.

When do I get my iPod photo?

- Posted on Monday, May 9, 2005 at 2:31 [ Permalink to this comment ]

I don’t get it.  What’s the surprise?

In the first case, it found 6,000+ matches for Adam Lasnik.  That is, more than 6,000 pages contain both words.

In the second case, it found only 2,000+ matches for “Adam Lasnik”.  That is only 2,000 or so pages had the words Adam Lasnik _in_that_order_.

I got your ad on both pages, btw.

Was there something else intriguing that I missed?

- Posted on Friday, June 3, 2005 at 20:29 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Oops, I forgot to update this entry.  I’ll go do that now.

In the meantime, you can find the answer here smile

- Posted on Sunday, June 5, 2005 at 20:58 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Grrr… even *I* forget that I have HTML turned off in comments.  Anyway, you can check out the answer to the puzzle here:
http://www.bladam.com/archives/0505182212.htm

- Posted on Sunday, June 5, 2005 at 20:59 [ Permalink to this comment ]

A)the oddness is that one result is faster and the other is slower .(.08-.79sec)
B)the cause for that are the quotes which also decrase the number of search results.

- Posted on Wednesday, June 15, 2005 at 4:19 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Does Google every year announces these kind of offers?

- Posted on Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 4:43 [ Permalink to this comment ]

1) for SE does not take to many time for results,
2) change of case may decrease or increase results

- Posted on Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 10:42 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Google may be giving the preference to the exact phrase while search results, it may look on case of letters when there are similar weight of search.

- Posted on Sunday, June 8, 2008 at 22:49 [ Permalink to this comment ]

lowercase and upercase are giving lot difference, i found it many times.

- Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 2:44 [ Permalink to this comment ]

Say something! If you're a member, log in first, though :-).
Name (Required)   Email (Optional)
Please include at least your first name or a nickname Only I, Adam, will see this. It's not posted!

Location or affiliation (Optional) URL (Optional)
e.g., Mannheim, Germany or Microsoft
or Seattle Savoy Club, etc.

Tags supported: <a href>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <strike>, <strong>, <pre>, <code>, and <blockquote>
Pop-up smiley chooser

I warmly welcome you to register and reserve your nickname.

While non-members are welcome to comment freely here, members get nifty benefits and more prominently displayed comments.

Signing up is free, super-fast and painless. No rude invasive questions or evil spam!

Register now or learn more :)

Remember my personal information (it'll be pre-filled for future comments here)
Send me an e-mail when others comment

IMPORTANT: Please type in the word adam below:
(This is to thwart automated spambots; sorry for the inconvenience)


A live preview of your comments will appear below as you type (including supported HTML but not showing graphical-smileys).

Next entry: When smart companies do dumb things
Previous entry: Etrade is evil. Got recommendations on a non-evil online brokerage?
FEEDS: Full-text, all categories:
Add to your My Yahoo! page Subscribe with Bloglines title= title= Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Subscribe in Rojo Add to Google
(See a complete list of category-specific and other BLADAM feeds!)
CREDITS:Site powered by ExpressionEngine. Cool menus by the Ultimate Dropdown Menu. Thoughtful advice and assistance from Ingmar, LisaJill, other awesome EE forum volunteers, and nice friends.
COPYRIGHT: My sites are the result of many hours of hard work. Kindly ask before using my content. Thanks! :)
[ Return to the top of the page]