<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">BLADAM: Life, Liberty, Love and Stuff &#45; (Full&#45;text feed)</title>
    <subtitle type="text">&#45; (topic and summary feeds available at http://www.bladam.com/main/subscription&#45;info)</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/atom-full" />
    <updated>2010-02-25T08:02:13Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2010, Adam</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="2.0.1pb01">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:bladam.com,2010:01:16</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Dear FB, Twitter &#45; We want narrowcasting, not just broadcasting!</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/narrowcasting" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2010:main/index/1.2325</id>
      <published>2010-01-16T23:12:08Z</published>
      <updated>2010-01-16T23:41:10Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="geekery"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/geekery"
        label="geekery" />
      <category term="communication&#45;tools"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/communication-tools"
        label="communication&#45;tools" />
      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <category term="people&#45;and&#45;relationships"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/people-and-relationships"
        label="people&#45;and&#45;relationships" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Earlier this week, I wanted to send a Facebook message to my dancer friends in the Bay Area to invite them to a local event.&nbsp; I ended up manually sifting through my entire friends list, since there&#8217;s no way to invite or message an intersection of friends.&nbsp; Similarly, I wanted to post a twitter note to my Google buddies in a particular geographic region, but Twitter doesn&#8217;t support any sort of useful narrowcasting, either.</p>

<p>Basically, social service nowadays seem hellbent on having us share our lives and connect with <em>more and more people</em>.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t want that, and I&#8217;m betting a lot of you feel the same way:&nbsp; we want to deepen our relationships with our <em>current</em> friends, share details of our lives with the friends who are most likely interested in those particular details, and so on.</p>

<p>A lot of the brouhaha over FBs aggressive more-sharing push has been over privacy, but in the rush to protest &#8220;ZOMG, I don&#8217;t want my mom to know THAT!&#8221; the complementary concerns of narrowcasting have been largely ignored.&nbsp; I&#8217;m personally a lot less worried about someone finding out something I don&#8217;t want them to know about, and far more concerned about burning out my friends with info they find irrelevant and uninteresting.</p>

<p>Is it not madness that I can&#8217;t post a note joking about a local politician just to my Mountain View friends?&nbsp; This highlights one of a great many situations in which there are no privacy issues (I&#8217;m not trying to keep my bad sense of humor a secret from my friends in Europe), but rather that my friends outside MV aren&#8217;t likely to care about this topic.&nbsp; And worse yet, these friends will likely stop reading my posts altogether unless I either post less overall (a bummer!) or magically somehow write entries that are appealing and relevant across my diverse group of friends (pretty impossible).</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>
</p> <p>I think I speak for most of us non-hermit&#8217;y types in noting that:
</p><ul><li>Our sphere of acquaintances and friends is growing at an astonishing rate&#8230; due to the awesome people we meet online, at work, via friends, from family members, etc.
<li>We have an innate desire to stay in touch with many of these folks and to share interesting and relevant stuff with them.
<li>Relationships are not symmetrical, nor are the related communications desires!&nbsp; I may hang on the every brilliant and witty word of a friend, but she may be, um, less fascinated with my mutterings (while still wanting to keep in touch with me overall)
<li>There should be easier ways for us to finetune who (and what groups) we share with and who we hear from&#8230; beyond the scope of privacy considerations.
<ul><li>For instance, it&#8217;d be awesome to be able to tell our computer: &#8220;I want to share this musing with my friends who love hiking and are within 20 miles of Mountain View&#8221; or, conversely, &#8220;Highlight messages from friends who live nearby me and aren&#8217;t talking about politics.&#8221;</ul></ul>

<p>But alas, services like Facebook seem to be lately more concerned about giving people a megaphone than letting them share and filter more effectively.&nbsp; They&#8217;re <em>amplifying and extending the noise</em>, which from what I gather, is more likely to alienate people than have them maintain Facebook as part of their daily routine.&nbsp; And that&#8217;s a shame.</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>What do you think?<br />
- Do you share my interests in narrowcasting?<br />
- Or do I have an unusually large addressbook and/or overly geeky demands re: sharing and filtering?<br />
- Are you familiar with any services that are helping folks connect more deeply vs. broadly?
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>If you&#8217;re going to contact me&#8230;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/contacting-adam" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2010:main/index/1.2324</id>
      <published>2010-01-04T06:04:28Z</published>
      <updated>2010-01-04T06:38:29Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="personal"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/personal"
        label="personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>I love you (you, you, NOT you!), but I don&#8217;t always love how you try to contact me.</p>

<p>I have a few respectful requests:
</p><ul><li>Use <a href="http://www.adamlasnik.net/admin/contact.htm">my contact page</a>, please.&nbsp; It&#8217;s super-easy to find (top page in Google for &#8220;Contact Adam Lasnik&#8221;), and I even list my e-mail address on there.&nbsp; Every time you instead try to get my attention via Twitter or Facebook message or LinkedIn or Flickr, Goddess kills a doggy [hint: that&#8217;s bad.]
<li>Please use a descriptive subject line.&nbsp; This precludes &#8220;HELP!&#8221; or &#8220;Hi!&#8221; or &#8220;Great Pharmacy!!1&#8221;
<li>Don&#8217;t unsolicitedly send me a detailed business plan.&nbsp; Seriously, this one really pains me to write, but when I receive a heartfelt and amazingly-detailed-with-multiple-attachment business idea for an existing Google product, my cover-my-posterior-reaction is to delete the note without reading it.&nbsp; Google already gets sued a ridiculous number of times a week, and I don&#8217;t want Google (or me!) to be sued for &#8220;stealing someone&#8217;s idea without credit.&#8221; :-(&nbsp; On the other hand, bug reports, a clever feature request or observation&#8230; if you can&#8217;t find a way to share this info with the appropriate Google team (e.g., via an official forum or form), feel free to fill me in and I&#8217;ll do the best I can to get it seen by the right people <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />.

and, on a related note&#8230;

<li>Please forgive me.&nbsp; I&#8217;m still behind on my personal e-mail (about 380 messages in my inbox, down from last year&#8217;s high of nearly 5,000), so it can take me a while to reply.</ul>

<p>Thanks!
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>A heartwarming story about bridging the culture gap</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/heartwarming-crossculture-story" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2323</id>
      <published>2009-11-30T05:47:11Z</published>
      <updated>2010-02-25T08:02:13Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="personal"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/personal"
        label="personal" />
      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <category term="people&#45;and&#45;relationships"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/people-and-relationships"
        label="people&#45;and&#45;relationships" />
      <category term="travel"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/travel"
        label="travel" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>[I wrote this years ago, but had posted it on a site I no longer maintain; I thought it might be nice to share it with you now.]</p>

<p>As many of you may already know, I spent over a year total in Europe during and immediately after finishing grad school in &#8216;98. My experiences included an amazing mixture of triumphs, tragedies, laughter, adventure, confusion, and pretty much every other emotion one can have&#8230; but compressed in time and on foreign soil. </p>

<p>While I regret not keeping any semblance of a diary during my time in Europe, I still carry a wealth of knowledge and emotions in me&#8230; much of which bubbles to the surface at random times. For whatever reason, one event came to mind tonight, and it made me smile. </p>

<p>During my initial 3 month internship in Europe, I was dying to &#8216;taste&#8217; as much of the continent as I could. My workplace was next to a train station, and nearly every other Friday I&#8217;d bring a small suitcase to work, and spin the virtual Europe-roulette-wheel (and consult the weather forecasts) to pick a travel destination for the upcoming weekend. I&#8217;d then leave straight from work, typically take an overnight train, spend Saturday and Sunday at my destination, and arrive back&#8212;sleepy eyed and exhausted&#8212;to work Monday morning. </p>

<p>Spontaneity and adventure sometimes gave way, however, to frustrating circumstances&#8230; including nasty weather, obnoxious hostel (and hostile) roommates, and in some cases, lack of an available nearby hostel at all. Such was the case when I arrived in Luxembourg one weekend&#8230; forcing me to scour surrounding smaller cities for lodging. When I finally discovered a hostel with vacancies in a far outlying town of the main city, I was none too thrilled to find myself alone at this hostel&#8230; except for a gaggle of giggling teenage German tourists from what turned out to be a church group outing. They ate at their reserved table for dinner within the hostel, and I ate, basically alone and lonely, by myself in another corner&#8230; understandably not wanting to butt in on a chaperoned group of young&#8217;uns. </p>

<p>To my annoyance, they&#8217;d occasionally look at me with eyes that seemed to mockingly ask, &#8220;What is that weird, tired looking guy doing at OUR hostel?&#8221; but aside from that, I ate in peace, and then&#8212;noting it was too early to retire for the night despite my fatigue&#8212;wandered out into the cobblestone streets to find something to do or see. </p>

<p>There wasn&#8217;t much. But lo and behold, before long, I heard a familiar gaggle of giggling a ways behind me, and, almost as if in a cartoon, that very same group of young kids shushed quickly when I peered back at them. Imagine my surprise then, when one of the girls broke from the pack and shyly approached me. </p>

<p>
</p> <p>&#8220;Hallo,&#8221; she said, not quite sure of herself, but with quiet yet visible support from her friends behind her. </p>

<p>Still shocked, I blurted out an American &#8220;Hi there&#8221; instead of a matching Hallo. </p>

<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re English?&#8221; she asked. </p>

<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; I replied, &#8220;American.&#8221; </p>

<p>Her face lit up with a big smile, which compensated for the moment of silence between us. </p>

<p>She told me she was from Germany, which I knew, but I never could have anticipated the next turn in our conversation. </p>

<p>&#8220;Are you&#8230; by yourself?&#8221; she asked? I answered affirmatively, still confused by this situation&#8230; and I&#8217;ll never forget what came next: </p>

<p>&#8220;Do you want to be our friend?&#8221; </p>

<p>Such sweetness and innocence and courage! I could have hugged that kid right there.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Instead, though, I delved into one of the most honest and memorable conversations I had during my time Europe. The friends of this girl, Christina, immediately sensed that I DID welcome a chat with them. And so, as they approached, they fired off a sometimes cacophanous bunch of questions in German for Christina to translate to me, and then waited eagerly for my response and acting-spokeswoman Christina&#8217;s translation. </p>

<p>A few of the questions were admittedly ignorant but nonetheless amusing in their simplicity: &#8220;Do you [Americans] really eat at McDonald&#8217;s all the time?&#8221; and &#8220;Are all the streets in the States very big?&#8221; </p>

<p>Before long, it was clear that most of what these kids knew of America they had gleaned from their exposure to the dominant American media. And that, indeed, scared me. Baywatch is SUPER-big in Germany (and apparently leads at least a few Germans to assume we&#8217;re all Malibu-stylin&#8217; and beach going tansters). David Hasselhoff may be a laughingstock amongst some of the &#8216;hipper&#8217; Germans, but he&#8217;s still a beloved actor and recording artist for much of Deutschland. In other words&#8230; given what we &#8216;export&#8217; to Europe, we should all be afraid&#8230; be very afraid! </p>

<p>But before long, as the kids got braver with their English and started addressing me directly, I began to delve deeper into their opinions and prejudices. </p>

<p>&#8220;So what do you think of Americans?&#8221; I asked plainly. </p>

<p>They were none too shy or slow with their responses. &#8220;Creative!&#8221; &#8220;FAT!&#8221; &#8220;Sportive!&#8221; &#8220;Lazy!&#8221; &#8220;Funny!&#8221; and &#8220;Friendly!&#8221; seemed to be relatively agreed-upon adjectives. But the latter one spurred some deeper discussion, with one boy arguing that, &#8220;Americans don&#8217;t like Germans. They&#8217;re friendly to themselves but not to us. From the War.&#8221; </p>

<p>I should have been prepared for this. Even at parties with college-aged folk, the issue of the Holocaust often came up. What did Americans think of Germany? Of Germans? Of the War? And why? Was it fair to perpetuate the Guilt? Those that brought up this subject with me often did so almost randomly, over beers and fries, though with sometimes pretty intense curiosity and passion. </p>

<p>This same curiosity, combined with innocence, was so clearly present in these young kids. On one hand, they saw America as everything &#8220;cool&#8221;... but still so distant geographically and emotionally. There was a marked admiration for, yet confusion about and partially even disdain for Americans, perhaps no different than that reflected by our own general ignorance of other cultures. </p>

<p>But here there was such a heartwarming yearning from them to connect to me, to connect with the America I was an impromptu representative for. They continued asking me questions for nearly an hour, and drew closer to me all the while until I was almost surrounded. &#8220;You are nice!&#8221; gushed one of the girls out of the blue, prompting some titterings in German that I understood more than they realized.&nbsp; Not long after this, Christina&#8212;by now pretty emboldened and unshy&#8212;asked, &#8220;Can I have your address?&#8221; </p>

<p>&#8220;Sure,&#8221; I replied, amused and flattered, though I couldn&#8217;t help but ask, &#8220;Why?&#8221; </p>

<p>&#8220;Because Julia likes you!&#8221; Christina replied with a huge grin, followed by a horrified look on a quickly clued-in Julia, &#8220;And she won&#8217;t ask you!&#8221; </p>

<p>Silly kids. Playful, wondering, movie-watching, tall, short, blonde, brunette, crush-having, sneaker-wearing kids. </p>

<p>At that moment I was reminded&#8230; that deep down we&#8217;re pretty much all the same, everywhere. There&#8217;s a child-like curiosity and goodness in everyone that never really dies. Sometimes it gets hardened a bit or repressed or shouted over, but it&#8217;s still there. </p>

<p>I had been tired and lonely and frustrated before I met these kids. And there are certainly times nowadays, too, when I&#8217;m feeling like that. But when life accentuates separation and distance, I look back on my encounter in Luxembourg and similar experiences and am reassured that friendship and understanding are still inherently valued. And though I never did hear from Julia, thinking of her and her friends especially makes me smile <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>A handy spreadsheet for calculating foreign currency values</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/online-currency-conversion" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2322</id>
      <published>2009-11-29T07:10:51Z</published>
      <updated>2009-11-29T07:31:52Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="travel"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/travel"
        label="travel" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>I decided to take a bit of this long weekend to prep for yet another overseas trip (this time to Sydney, which I really like!).</p>

<p>Digging into my Travel (real-space, not electronic) folder, I found a plethora of Australian bills and coins from my last trip, along with a ton of other bills and coins from nine other countries.&nbsp; Eeep!&nbsp; After sorting them all out, then I wondered:&nbsp; how much is all of this worth?</p>

<p>$368.89 as it turns out.&nbsp; Nice! (especially if I can find a local bank to actually change the money with little fees and decent rates, but that&#8217;s another issue).</p>

<p>Then I began thinking&#8230; hmm&#8230; if I prettied this spreadsheet I made and generalized it a bit, it might be useful to other folks, too!&nbsp; So here it is:</p>

 <iframe width='700' height='300' frameborder='0' src='http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=t6_0lobISZFglF5SMiAnsJw&amp;single=true&amp;gid=0&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'></iframe>

<p>As you&#8217;ve probably noticed, that sheet&#8212;while actually reflecting my newfound wealth AND updated in near-real-time&#8212;is <em>read-only</em> for you.&nbsp; Bummer.&nbsp; But fear not!&nbsp; You can load the full document <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AjCHVm2Jt9MsdDZfMGxvYklTWkZnbEY1U01pQW5zSnc&amp;hl=en">here</a>, select FILE, then COPY, and voila!&nbsp; You now have your own neato spreadsheet.&nbsp; And by the way&#8230; you only need to change the stuff highlighted in yellow; the rest should be automatically computed for you.</p>

<p>A couple things I found fascinating in building this sheet:
</p><ul><li>GoogleLookup flawlessly looked up the currency code from the countries specified!&nbsp; Formula:&nbsp; =googlelookup(A1,&#8220;currency code&#8221;) (A*=each country name).&nbsp; Took a little experimenting for me to figure out the right search phrase <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />
<li>And then there&#8217;s the neato Google Currency Conversion lookup thing.&nbsp; Formula: =GoogleFinance(CURRENCY:CUR1CUR2) where CUR1 is the original currency and CUR2 is the currency you are converting to.&nbsp; Thanks to a helpful comment on Friendfeed from <a href="http://friendfeed.com/dulitz">Daniel Dulitz</a>, I realized I could use CONCATENATE to make this more generalizable / non-hard-coded for both currency values.</ul>

<p>Hope you find this useful, or at least interesting <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" /> 
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Overheard at the optometrist today</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/opto-overheard" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2321</id>
      <published>2009-11-19T07:29:14Z</published>
      <updated>2009-11-19T07:31:15Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="grab&#45;bag"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/grab-bag"
        label="grab&#45;bag" />
      <category term="wackiness"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/wackiness"
        label="wackiness" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Cranky Old Guy #1:&nbsp; What did you do to your glasses?!<br />
Cranky Old Guy #2:&nbsp; I stepped on them.<br />
Cranky Old Guy #1:&nbsp; [a thinkify&#8217;ing pause] You&#8217;re not supposed to do that!
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Time spent on social networks and the like &#45;&amp;nbsp; I&#8217;ll show you mine if you&#8217;ll show me yours</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/time-spent-on-social-media-and-networks" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2320</id>
      <published>2009-10-13T07:11:45Z</published>
      <updated>2009-10-13T08:18:46Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="geekery"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/geekery"
        label="geekery" />
      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>After having fallen hugely behind on browsing my Facebook newsfeed, Friendfeed, etc., I decided to see just how much time I had been spending during those &#8220;on top of it&#8221; days&#8230; and, by extension, how much time it&#8217;d take me to keep up each day.</p>

<p>Around 10pm last night, I &#8220;cleared out&#8221; my Reader, and picked a stopping point in Facebook and Friendfeed, so I could start fresh tonight (Monday) and see just how much would accumulate in 24 hours&#8230; and how long it&#8217;d take me to get through it.</p>

<p><strong>So here are my numbers:</strong>
</p><ul><li>Facebook:&nbsp; Browsing (and commenting a bit) on a filtered newsfeed of one group of 270 friends:&nbsp; 20 minutes</li>
<li>Friendfeed:&nbsp; Browsing (and commenting/liking a bit) on a selected group comprised of about 80 friends:&nbsp; 8 minutes</li>
<li>Twitter:&nbsp; Browsed through unfiltered/ungrouped list via Brizzly (happy to offer invites to the first ten people who <a href="http://www.adamlasnik.net/admin/contact.htm">contact me</a>):&nbsp; 12 minutes.
<li>Reader:&nbsp; Browsing through my ??? feeds (and checking out a few original pages + adding a couple comments):&nbsp; 28 minutes (&#8221;???&#8221; because Reader never was able to load up anything when I clicked on &#8220;Manage my subscriptions.&#8221;&nbsp; Bummer!&nbsp; But I&#8217;m guessing I have over 200 feeds, of which probably 100 are updated at least weekly)</li></ul>

<p>Just a bit over an hour.&nbsp; Not that bad, right?&nbsp; Except when you realize a few very important things:
</p><ul><li>This is more than an hour <em>every single day</em>, including weekends, holidays, vacation times, etc.</li>
<li>Worse yet (and more importantly), this <em>does not include my personal e-mail</em>, which I estimate would take me about an hour daily in and of itself to read and appropriately reply to messages.</li>
<li>Nor does this include Wave.&nbsp; Or Techmeme.&nbsp; Or online News.&nbsp; Or really anything else in the vast online world.</li>
<li>It certainly doesn&#8217;t include the time I <em>should</em> be spending composing thoughtful e-mails to my Grandpa, to my friends near and far, and so on.&nbsp; 500 or so contacts in my addressbook&#8230; people that I care about.&nbsp; If I e-mailed each one just once a month, that&#8217;s more than one substantive e-mail every day (in addition to the other replies).
<li>And it certainly doesn&#8217;t include corporate (work) mail and related stuff, but that&#8217;s well beyond the scope of this inquiry, in which I&#8217;m trying to pin down <em>this</em>...</li></ul>

<p><strong>How much of my free time do I spend (or would I have to spend each day) on &#8220;keeping up&#8221; with friends and news online?</strong></p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>Well, now you know, or at least have an idea about my time allocations.&nbsp; <br />
<strong>Where does your time go?</strong><br />
- How much time do <em>you</em> spend each day on Facebook, Twitter, etc.?&nbsp; (Not sure?&nbsp; Try what I did, and actually time it!)<br />
- Is that more than you thought?&nbsp; Less than you thought?&nbsp; Does it make sense for you?</p>

<p>Curious to hear your numbers and your feelings on this&#8230;</p>

<p>[<strong>Edited at 1:18am October 13 to add:</strong> Twitter stats</strong>]
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Amazon, inexplicably hampering its most loyal customers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/amazon-past-purchase-search-issues" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2319</id>
      <published>2009-10-05T04:09:40Z</published>
      <updated>2009-11-09T01:31:41Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="business&#45;and&#45;consumers"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/business-and-consumers"
        label="business&#45;and&#45;consumers" />
      <category term="business&#45;cheers&#45;and&#45;jeers"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/business-cheers-and-jeers"
        label="business&#45;cheers&#45;and&#45;jeers" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>[Note:&nbsp; Links below are affiliate links, so if you click and buy, I make money.]</p>

<p>I have bought hundreds of items from Amazon (yes, I&#8217;m an <a href="http://j.mp/2Ek5Kz">Amazon Prime</a> member, surprise surprise <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/raspberry.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="raspberry" style="border:0;" />)</p>

<p>Some of them I&#8217;m particularly fond of and want to either repurchase or recommend to a friend&#8230; but I can&#8217;t do easily because Amazon won&#8217;t help me.&nbsp; You see, I&#8217;ve not been able to figure out any way to search through my purchases; it seems I can only browse by year (and paginatedly browse at that&#8230; ack!).&nbsp; </p>

<p>I bought an amazing compressible travel pillow (below) a while back that I absolutely love, and I wanted to encourage my parents to get it for their upcoming trip to New Zealand:</p>

<p>[oops, pillow seems to no longer be listed on Amazon, and graphic was just showing a generic Amazon ad.&nbsp; Blech!]</p>

<p>...but couldn&#8217;t find any sane way to look up the product.&nbsp; <br />
- I tried doing an Amazon search for &#8220;travel pillow&#8221; but there are hundreds if not thousands of travel pillows in their store.<br />
- I then tried searching through my gmail (where I get my Amazon order receipts) for &#8220;travel pillow&#8221; but that didn&#8217;t turn it up.<br />
- Somewhat randomly, I then searched Amazon for &#8220;orange travel pillow&#8221; and that did the trick.</p>

<p>Amazon, why do you make this so difficult for your active customers?&nbsp; Why not a simple search box in the My Orders screen?</p>

<p><strong>Edited on November 8, 2009 to add:</strong><br />
Looks like Amazon no longer sells this pillow.&nbsp; Bummer!
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Truly stupid Facebook status updates</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/dumb-facebook-status-updates" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2318</id>
      <published>2009-10-03T23:28:31Z</published>
      <updated>2009-10-03T23:32:32Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="grab&#45;bag"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/grab-bag"
        label="grab&#45;bag" />
      <category term="wackiness"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/wackiness"
        label="wackiness" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>One of my favorite newsweeklies, <a href="http://www.theweek.com">The Week</a>, has <a href="http://theweek.com/contest">a weekly competition</a> where they solicit various entertaining submissions on goofy name ideas or lists.</p>

<p>A few weeks ago, highlighting the crazy case of some Australian kids Facebook-status&#8217;ing that they&#8217;d fallen into a well or something like that, they asked for some other ideas of truly stupid Facebook updates.</p>

<p>Well, I submitted a handful&#8230; but clearly the editor of this contest lacks good taste, &#8216;cause she didn&#8217;t pick any of mine :(.&nbsp; So, for your edification, I&#8217;ve included them below <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" /></p>

<p>&#8212;-<br />
1) &#8220;OMG, I can&#8217;t believe my stupid teacher is reading my Facebook feed!&#8221;<br />
2) &#8220;Honey, I think I might be pregnant. Is it yours?!&#8221;<br />
3) &#8220;Having sex. BRB in a minute.&#8221;<br />
4) &#8220;Honey, could you please get the remote for me? I&#8217;m in the bedroom.&#8221;<br />
5) &#8220;OMG, DID I JUST POST THAT? THOUGHT IT WAS SEARCH BOX! HELP!&#8221;<br />
6)&nbsp; &#8220;My darling Jennifer, will you marry me?&#8221;<br />
7) &#8220;How do I post a status update?&#8221;<br />
8) &#8220;Unsubscribe!&#8221;<br />
9) &#8220;I am Mobutu Rumppole, a Nigerian Prince&#8230;&#8221;<br />
10) &#8220;Just got spider bite. Fingers swelling pretty bad, hardto type, any ideas on what I sh&#8221;
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Don&#8217;t get a G1 (but do keep an eye out for Android Awesomeness!)</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/dont-get-a-g1" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2317</id>
      <published>2009-09-12T21:12:41Z</published>
      <updated>2009-09-12T21:41:42Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="geekery"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/geekery"
        label="geekery" />
      <category term="communication&#45;tools"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/communication-tools"
        label="communication&#45;tools" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>When it took me seven seconds just to be able to answer a phone call, that&#8217;s when I realized I had finally had enough.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve never used an iPhone and due to disapproval over Apple&#8217;s policies probably never well, so this is not a &#8220;G1 Sucks iPhone Rules!!!1&#8221; post.&nbsp; Unfortunately, it&#8217;s still a rant against the G1.</p>

<p>First, let me offer some disclaimers:<br />
1) I&#8217;m a power user.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve downloaded lots of apps, and overall, they rock.&nbsp; Google Maps on the G1 is awesome.&nbsp; Pandora&#8217;s new Android app made me literally giggle with glee.&nbsp; And the Android OS, while clearly still a bit rough, has great potential IMHO.&nbsp; But perhaps <em>because</em> I&#8217;m a power user (installing many apps and pushing the phone to its limits), the phone has been more frustrating for me than it is (or would be) for more, heh, normal people.<br />
2) And speaking of normal people&#8230; my sister&#8212;who is crazy-smart but hardly an early adopter geek&#8212;LOVES her G1.&nbsp; She pretty much only uses it for phone calls and checking her e-mail, but the latter came in handy wonderfully when her desktop computer was down and also when the electricity was out where she lives.&nbsp; She&#8217;s had no problems figuring out how to use the phone, and seemingly no problems getting it to do what she wants to do with it.&nbsp; Though granted, when I last spoke with her, she hadn&#8217;t actually installed a single app.<br />
3) I know people on the Android team and I hope they do not hate me after this post.&nbsp; They&#8217;re genuinely good, smart, hardworking folks who IMHO made an admirable effort towards Android Phone v1.&nbsp; When the phone works well (and let me note, it mostly does), it makes you appreciate the power and opportunities in an open mobile OS</p>

<p>Alas, though, for better or worse, working well most of the time isn&#8217;t sufficient for a phone. Phones should work <em>reliably and consistently</em> well, and the G1 does not.&nbsp; It comes down to the hardware: Ouch.&nbsp; Ouch.&nbsp; Ouch.&nbsp; Slow, as in, it often takes over five seconds for the home page to show up after you click the home button.&nbsp; That, combined with the flakiness in making and receiving calls, makes it a pretty lousy phone for phone calls. And regardless of my preference for e-mail over voice calls most of the time, this is still absolutely, positively unacceptable in a <em>phone</em>.</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>Many of you may be surprised to hear me publicly railing against what some refer to as &#8220;the Google Phone.&#8221;&nbsp; I note (with some pride) that my policy has pretty much always been to offer public praise on Google products when I feel they deserve it and private (within-Google) blunt-yet-constructive criticisms of Google products that (to me) fall short.</p>

<p>But&#8230;<br />
1) This technically isn&#8217;t a &#8220;Google phone.&#8221;&nbsp; We made the software, but someone else made the hardware.&nbsp; I&#8217;m mentioning this as a technicality, admittedly, and not intending to just pass the buck.&nbsp; Ultimately, it&#8217;s got our name on it and we should (and I believe do) take both responsibility and credit for Android phones that include what&#8217;s known as the &#8220;Google Experience.&#8221;<br />
<strong>2) I can say with firm confidence that many of the phones coming down the pike this year (18-20 is the number publicly pre-announced!) simply ROCK.&nbsp; </strong>&nbsp; And I want folks&#8217; first experience with Android to be one that&#8217;s consistently AWESOME, not just &#8220;Hmm, pretty good most of the time.&#8221;</p>

<p>You should be asking Santa for an Android phone this Christmas, even if you&#8217;re an atheist.&nbsp; Er, okay, if you&#8217;re a non-Christian, perhaps you should just go out and buy an Android phone yourself.&nbsp; You&#8217;ll appreciate the better (much better) hardware, slicker UIs, and a lot more to make you smile.
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Tragedy of the social commons</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/tragedy-of-the-social-commons" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2316</id>
      <published>2009-09-10T07:39:59Z</published>
      <updated>2009-09-10T08:24:00Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="dancing"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/dancing"
        label="dancing" />
      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <category term="people&#45;and&#45;relationships"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/people-and-relationships"
        label="people&#45;and&#45;relationships" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Tonight I was tired.&nbsp; Tired but&#8212;perhaps solely through repeated mental flagellations&#8212;ready to be brave.</p>

<p>Tonight at the weekly swing dance, I was going to ask Miss Q to dance.&nbsp; Extremely talented, very attractive, and admirably most humble, too.&nbsp; Miss Q, that is.&nbsp; Darned ambiguous references, but indeed I digress.</p>

<p>Grammatical nits aside&#8230; for reasons I cannot quite narrow down for certain, it appears as though my bravery was either contagious or most coincidentally most ill-timed or a combination thereof. You see, that *other* fellow was determined to dance with Miss Q.&nbsp; And the young man beside him.&nbsp; And yes, that other chap dashing up beside the both of them.</p>

<p>Miss Q had a queue and a rather constant queue at that.&nbsp; Oh, not the visible English-style straight version, but rather a discernible one nonetheless.&nbsp; Ranging from skulking to brazen, star-struck and/or love-struck leads grabbed their opportunity, sometimes with frightening literalness, and Miss Q handled it all with the utmost in grace and good nature.&nbsp; Was she delighted or annoyed or simply exhausted by all the attention?&nbsp; I cannot say.&nbsp; I was quietly and perhaps just a bit more than mildly seething at my ill fortune, and so in this circumstance I cannot fully trust my normally perceptive nature.</p>

<p>But I know this:&nbsp; of the collective of Miss Qs here and elsewhere on the dancefloor&#8212;particularly in this arenas where the Misses outnumber the Misters&#8212;there by my estimation must be an aggregate tiredness and frustration on the shoulders of both sexes.&nbsp; The Misses have nary a rest, much less a chance to do much choosing of their choosing.&nbsp; They pair with those who are the quickest, the most cunning, the most persistent, the most unsubtlely lurking in the not-so-background, which may or&#8212;more likely&#8212;may not dovetail with those who are the most talented or otherwise desirable partners.</p>

<p>And, as you surely may have guessed, the disappointment lies not just within the fairer sex here, but rests upon the equally unlucky section of lads.&nbsp; For we have two choices:&nbsp; one-up the others in desperate aggressiveness or sit on the side passively ruing our lot and the escalation of hounding-stealing-hoarding that has led to this sorry condition.&nbsp; Those compelled into the former may succeed on occasion but feel ashamed on the whole of what they&#8217;ve been driven to.&nbsp; And those self-relegated into the latter behavior must simply feel, well, stamped writ-large with a neon &#8216;L&#8217; upon their forehead.</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

 <p>What does this suggest, other than that I have a dramatic flair for cartooningly exaggerating a seemingly run-of-the-mill situation rather than answering e-mail or getting much needed sleep?</p>

<p>Ah, dear reader, it suggests more than this!&nbsp; Much more!&nbsp; For dance is but a metaphor for life!&nbsp; Or, at minimum, the situation I&#8217;ve described above reminds me of social interactions in a much broader sense than just the lead-follow rituals associated with selecting dance partners.</p>

<p>Bars.&nbsp; Clubs.&nbsp; Particularly given the most-typical uneven ratios of men (many) to women (few), what we end up with is an ever-escalating atmosphere of urgency, high volume, and desperation, which leads to the all-too-cliched-but-true situation of women massively annoyed by obnoxiously brazen and bad pickup lines and (worse) physical aggression.&nbsp; And on the other side, an unfortunate mix of mostly puzzled, frustrated, and perhaps even angry men who refuse to raise their bets and behavior (and thus fold)&nbsp; The women go home and complain to their girlfriends about being besieged by &#8220;jerks&#8221; all night, and guys complain to their mates about the unfortunate and equally-unfortunately-named &#8220;sausage fest&#8221; and the lack of opportunities reasonably available.</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>To clarify, my swing dance experiences are typically many many MANY times better than the hyper-clarified and starkly drawn portrait I&#8217;ve painted here.&nbsp; And for tonight, it was more my own stubbornness (I was set on dancing with one particular woman) that resulted in the sullying of what should have by all other measures been an outstanding night (presence of friends, a strong live band, etc.)&nbsp; But it made for a good excuse for a blog post and I found myself sincerely drawn (<a href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/date-with-supermodel/">once again</a>) to the parallels between social dancing and the broader arena of meeting and flirting and dating.&nbsp; Specifically, what I felt I was observing was a miniature version of the tragedy of the social commons which, upon further reflection, might better (albeit less pithily) be described as &#8220;The Tragic Inevitability of Behavioral Escalation in the Context of Mixed-Gender Social Environments.&#8221;&nbsp; But the latter&#8212;while a title I might be able to sell or rent to thesis&#8217;ing Psychology PhD students&#8212;is way too long for a catchy blog title.&nbsp; Almost as piss-poor a title as <a href="http://www.lala.com/#album/504684633535059268">some musical</a> one might otherwise wisely stumble upon.</p>

<p>Anyway, with all MY pontificating out of the way, what do you think?&nbsp; Do queues of the sort I described lead to women becoming frustrated and less apt to genially interact with guys?&nbsp; Or is this one-upmanship of sorts an expected but altogether benign reflection and self-selection of the assertive vs. the doormats, the latter of whom need to learn to buck up anyway? <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />&nbsp; I look forward to hearing your thoughts, even if those thoughts are, &#8220;For the love of Dog, Adam, why do you overanalyze stuff to such a degree, and at 1am no less?!&#8221;
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Cirque du Soleil&#8217;s &#8220;O&#8221; show in Las Vegas &#45; my review</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/cirque-du-soleil-o" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2315</id>
      <published>2009-08-08T23:09:38Z</published>
      <updated>2009-08-08T23:13:39Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="arts&#45;and&#45;entertainment"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/arts-and-entertainment"
        label="arts&#45;and&#45;entertainment" />
      <category term="theatre"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/theatre"
        label="theatre" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>So what did I think of <a href="http://www.cirquedusoleil.com/CirqueDuSoleil/en/showstickets/O/O-acts1.htm">Cirque du Soleil&#8217;s show &#8220;O&#8221;</a>?</p>

<p>Absolutely beautiful.&nbsp; I think my mouth was open most of the time, and I&#8217;m glad there weren&#8217;t flies about (just people flying, and they&#8217;re bigger.&nbsp; And sexier.&nbsp; And waterproof, apparently!)</p>

<p>One of my friends that attended with me joked (okay, somewhat lamely) that the show is called O because everyone keeps breathlessly sighing or marveling &#8220;Ooooooh!&#8221;&nbsp; But maybe she&#8217;s right.</p>

<p>Some quick specific thoughts:
</p><ul><li>I sat in row M.&nbsp; If I had my choice, I&#8217;d sit in maybe row D or E.&nbsp; I&#8217;d rather see expressions and subtle movements, even at the slight expense of getting &#8220;the overall picture.&#8221;&nbsp; Row M wasn&#8217;t bad at all, though.
<li>The expensive seats are $165 after tax.&nbsp; That hurts.&nbsp; Shockingly, I still think it was worth it, and I may attend again when I&#8217;m in Vegas next year.
<li>My three friends and I got last minute tickets (and, as noted, fine seats) by arriving just over two hours prior to a Thursday early show.&nbsp; I&#8217;m guessing this&#8217;d be much less successful Fri-Sun.&nbsp; And we got the *last* remaining tickets.&nbsp; So I&#8217;d indeed recommend booking ahead or&#8212;if you&#8217;re available to see a show on a weekday, get there 2.5 hours early and bring a snack to eat in line.
<li>I didn&#8217;t quite click with the clown scenes.&nbsp; Cute, but not particularly funny or entertaining.
<li>Sure, the feats of the performers were insanely amazing, but I was more taken by the artistic creativity and beauty of the show.&nbsp; There were a few sections in which I thought, hmm, maybe this is a bit repetitive, but overall, the show captured and held my attention strongly.
<li>Gotta pee?&nbsp; Go well *before* the show starts, or you&#8217;ll be pretty frustrated with, well, all the water around <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/wink.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="wink" style="border:0;" />.&nbsp; And there&#8217;s no intermission!
<li>O is in the Bellagio hotel, and the buffet there is outstanding!&nbsp; My friends and I were amazed at the quality and diversity of food that was available for our 9:30pm dinner!&nbsp; And, unlike most buffets, (non-alcoholic) drinks are included at no extra price&#8230; including fresh-squeezed OJ.&nbsp; Yum!</ul>

<p>Anyway, go see the show.&nbsp; Quite an experience! <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/smile.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="smile" style="border:0;" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Insane transparency&#8212;Seeing or even setting what your colleagues earn</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/compensation-transparency" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2314</id>
      <published>2009-08-08T20:55:41Z</published>
      <updated>2009-08-08T21:00:42Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <category term="workplace"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/workplace"
        label="workplace" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>At Google, we have pretty radical transparency, at least in Engineering where I sit.&nbsp; With few exceptions, we can all see what every colleague is working on (via the Project Database or &#8220;PDB&#8221;), what they&#8217;ve recently accomplished (via weekly self-composed &#8220;Snippets&#8221;), and even what their core contributions have been to the company (their Google resume).&nbsp; Through our performance review system, we can not only review our peers (and have them read exactly what we wrote about their strengths and weaknesses) but even review our bosses.</p>

<p>I think on the whole this transparency is outstanding&#8230; ethical and useful.&nbsp; But one part is missing, right?</p>

<p>- We can see what people are working on.<br />
- We can see how people are performing.<br />
= We can see what they accomplish.</p>

<p>but&#8230;</p>

<p>- We CANNOT see what their compensation is.</p>

<p>and beyond that&#8230;</p>

<p>- We do not have a direct SAY in their compensation, only quite indirect input into promotions.</p>

<p><strong>Let me make one thing very, very, very clear here:</p>

<p>I believe that total compensation transparency</strong> (beyond one&#8217;s own private understanding of his or her own salary and compensation mechanisms) <strong>IS A BAD IDEA.&nbsp; Let me repeat that.&nbsp; I am NOT seriously advocating that companies disclose the salary of each employee within or even outside of the company, nor do I suggest that employees be empowered to set and adjust their peers&#8217; compensation packages.</strong></p>

<p>But&#8230; what if?&nbsp; And why does salary remain so strongly one of the last taboos in this increasingly hip world of transparency?&nbsp; What is it about human nature which makes us (even me!) shudder at the thought of this specific set of ideas?</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

 <p>Notwithstanding my quite-likely rational revulsion to the idea of compensation transparency, it would seem that there are some good arguments for such openness:
</p><ul><li>This might fix (what rank-and-file consensus would deem) stunningly inappropriate salary packages&#8230; on either end of the spectrum.&nbsp; That do-nothing middle manager?&nbsp; He&#8217;s making WHAT?&nbsp; Not any more he isn&#8217;t!&nbsp; That super hard worker in internal systems who stays late and doesn&#8217;t get the glory of working on glamorous projects?&nbsp; Totally increase her salary!
<li>People would (at least in theory) be paid more along the lines of what they&#8217;re currently worth vs. what they had the savviness to negotiate.
<li>You could potentially stress out less when asking for a raise because either you&#8217;d have full knowledge of where you are on the pay scale or, in the scenario in which peers set your pay, it&#8217;d be out of your control.</ul>

<p>But I do believe there are far more arguments against radical compensation transparency.
</p><ul><li>Biases based upon &#8220;visible wealth&#8221; might skew perception and adjustments, resulting in harmful demotivations.&nbsp; Have you seen the car that manager drives?&nbsp; She surely doesn&#8217;t need more money.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s dock her pay (even though that may drive her out of the company, to the firm&#8217;s detriment).
<li>That aforementioned super dedicated hard worker in internal systems?&nbsp; Her low profile and lack of direct revenue impact may cause many to perceive her as less driven, less worthy of compensation star status despite the actual criticalness of her work in the background.
<li>Study after study has shown that our perception of and happiness with compensation is driven less by raw numbers or trends or even buying power, but rather keeping up with the Joneses.&nbsp; In other words, getting a raise of $5000 is apparently not nearly as satisfying as earning $5000 more than one&#8217;s teammate.&nbsp; Can you imagine the drama involved with compensation transparency given this aspect of human nature?!</ul>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>And here&#8217;s an even crazier additional proposal:<br />
What if you could actually set your own pay (again, with the group transparency)?&nbsp; As in, each quarter or year, literally determine how much you&#8217;re paid (though obviously if you asked for $10 million, the company could fire you on the spot due to reasons of insanity).
</p><ul><li>Rich folks who were working just for the love of it could more easily adjust/decline &#8220;excessive&#8221; salaries.
<li>People might temper their pay a bit out of embarrassment, realizing that they really shouldn&#8217;t be earning 8x what their equally-worthy colleagues do.
<li>People who needed a bit extra short term (for a house payment, etc.) could temporarily front-load their salaries.
<li>When an individual employee accomplished an admirable but not very visible achievement, they could again temporarily increase their pay.&nbsp; Or when they realized that they&#8217;d been slacking, they could dock their pay.
<li>Or if an individual felt like taking a couple of extra days off, they could take that as &#8220;unpaid time&#8221; without form filling and bureaucracy.</ul>

<p>There&#8217;s some precedent for this self-determination at work; Netflix, for instance, lets their employees take vacation &#8220;as needed&#8221; without a preset limit.&nbsp; And vacation is a type of compensation, right?</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>What do you think?&nbsp; Again, please remember that I&#8217;m bringing this topic up not to advocate change but to philosophically examine our thoughts on compensation, transparency, taboos, and so on <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Knott&#8217;s Berry Farm&#8212;For shame!</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/knotts-berry-ingredients" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2313</id>
      <published>2009-06-15T07:51:32Z</published>
      <updated>2009-06-15T08:20:33Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="business&#45;and&#45;consumers"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/business-and-consumers"
        label="business&#45;and&#45;consumers" />
      <category term="business&#45;cheers&#45;and&#45;jeers"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/business-cheers-and-jeers"
        label="business&#45;cheers&#45;and&#45;jeers" />
      <category term="marketing&#45;and&#45;advertising"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/marketing-and-advertising"
        label="marketing&#45;and&#45;advertising" />
      <category term="happy&#45;body"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/happy-body"
        label="happy&#45;body" />
      <category term="food&#45;and&#45;nutrition"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/food-and-nutrition"
        label="food&#45;and&#45;nutrition" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Okay, this is not a rant on junk food.&nbsp; I think when people eat Cheez-wiz, they aren&#8217;t misguided enough to assume they&#8217;re eating healthful real cheese.&nbsp; When people eat a double fudge brownie, I doubt they&#8217;re confusing this with an apple.&nbsp; And when people eat Cap&#8217;n Crunch cereal, there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;d assume they&#8217;re consuming real fruit.&nbsp; Oh, um, wait a minute, <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=crunchberries">someone did</a>?&nbsp; Er, well, anyway, you get my point <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" /></p>

<p>But seriously&#8230; sometimes there&#8217;s an absolute nasty &amp; unhealthy food paired with such obnoxiously, blatantly misleading marketing that I can&#8217;t help calling a spade a hyrogenated [sic] artificially flavored spade.</p>

<p>First, the marketing that, by all means, should condemn some marketer to eternal dietary hell:
</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;In 1920, Walter and Cordelia Knott began selling fresh produce, berries, and preserves from a roadside berry stand in Buena Park, California.&nbsp; Their family business earned a place in history in 1932 when Walter Knott cultivated a lucious new fruit, the boysenberry.&nbsp; The farm that started it all has also become a family amusement park that delights millions.</p>

<p>The Knott family is pleased to extend their tradition of quality to include premium shortbread cookies.&nbsp; Richly flavorful, these classic favorites are prepared using popular Knott&#8217;s Berry farm fruit fillings.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>Let&#8217;s dissect this, shall we?</p>

<p>> In 1920, Walter and Cordelia Knott began selling fresh produce, berries, and preserves from a roadside berry stand in Buena Park, California.<br />
...and boy, would they be horrified to see how their heirs have sold them out!</p>

<p>> ...when Walter Knott cultivated a lucious new fruit, the boysenberry.</p>

<p>...which you&#8217;ll find all of likely one-tenth of a gram of in this plasticfood monstrosity.</p>

<p>> ... premium shortbread cookies<br />
... where &#8220;premium&#8221; means &#8220;premium profits for us, utter crap for you.&#8221;</p>

<p>> ... Richly flavorful<br />
... from lots of high fructose corn syrup</p>

<p>> ... these classic favorites<br />
... if you call a frankenstein concoction of chemicals &#8220;classic.&#8221;&nbsp; Maybe a classic case of deceit.</p>

<p>> ... using popular Knott&#8217;s Berry farm fruit fillings.<br />
... oh, wait, we meant popular dental fillings!</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But enough pre-commentary.&nbsp; Without further ado, let&#8217;s take a look at these charming ingredients, shall we? (and out of kindness, I&#8217;ll substitute normal text for the ALL CAPS printed)
</p><blockquote><p>Enriched wheat flour [artificial vitamin enrichment crap omitted], margarine (liquid soybean oil, partially hyrogenated [sic] soybean oil, water, salt, whey, lecithin, mono and di-glycerides, sodium benzoate a preservative, artificial butter flavor, beta carotene and vitamin A palmitate), raspberry topping (high fructose corn syrup, red raspberries, apple powder, fruit pectin, citric acid, natural and artificial flavors, calcium chloride, FD&amp;C red #40 and blue #1), sugar, eggs, baking soda, natural and artificial flavor, baking ammonium, and salt.</p></blockquote><p>
Mmmm&#8230; delicious, no?&nbsp; Just like Grandma would have made it&#8230; if she had access to a chemistry lab *and* passionately hated your guts.</p>

<p>Oh, and lookie here, (unsurprisingly) almost no redeeming nutritive qualities at all&#8230; little fiber or protein, and a charming <a href="http://www.myfitnesspal.com/food/calories/knotts-berry-farm-premium-cookies-raspberry-shortbread-571343">3 grams of trans-fat</a> (I didn&#8217;t even know there were many packaged goods that still had this stuff in &#8216;em nowadays!)</p>

<p>For comparison, let&#8217;s take a look at a typical recipe for berry shortbread cookies:
</p><blockquote><p>1 cup butter, softened<br />
2/3 cup sugar<br />
1/2 teaspoon almond extract<br />
2 cups all-purpose flour<br />
1/3 cup seedless raspberry jam<br />
GLAZE:<br />
1 cup confectioners&#8217; sugar<br />
2 teaspoons water<br />
1/2 teaspoon almond extract</p>

<p>(from <a href="http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Berry-Shortbread-Dreams/Detail.aspx">AllRecipes.com</a>)</p></blockquote>

<p>Notice a difference?&nbsp; Yes!&nbsp; You recognize and can likely pronounce the ingredients, and there are fewer than a dozen of them.&nbsp; </p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

<p>Look, as I said, I don&#8217;t have a problem with companies making utter junkfood.&nbsp; I do, however, have a problem about them so blatantly misrepresenting their product.&nbsp; Even an intelligent acquaintance of mine said (without any prompting from me) that she used to eat these cookies every day for lunch, figuring that they were relatively harmless.&nbsp; Oops!</p>

<p>P.S.&#8212;Might think twice before buying any of Knott&#8217;s Berry Farm jams or other products, eh?
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>#geekfail&#8212;Valuing immediacy over depth, accuracy, and understanding</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/depth-vs-understanding" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2312</id>
      <published>2009-06-14T21:11:08Z</published>
      <updated>2009-06-14T21:43:09Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="geekery"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/geekery"
        label="geekery" />
      <category term="communication&#45;tools"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/communication-tools"
        label="communication&#45;tools" />
      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Yesterday, I learned about the turmoil in Iran&#8230; from the blogosphere.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/dear_cnn_please_check_twitter_for_news_about_iran.php">Some have argued</a> that the immediacy of news on this and other breaking topics is a sign that mainstream media has failed and online media&#8212;specifically &#8220;real time&#8221; components of online media&#8212;have triumphed.&nbsp; I believe such an assumption is not only dead wrong, but dangerous to society.</p>

<p>Today, I can get more information&#8212;and more importantly, more *verified* information&#8212;about the situation in Iran from mainstream media.&nbsp; And in a few days, I&#8217;ll no doubt be able to get some insightful background information, valuable context, and more-likely-accurate news from weekly magazines.</p>

<p>Even online, let&#8217;s compare, one day later:<br />
- <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=iran">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=iran</a><br />
- <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=iran">http://news.google.com/news?q=iran</a></p>

<p>Some would argue&#8230; but Adam, don&#8217;t you want information <em>right now</em>?&nbsp; How can you wait a day or even a week to learn what&#8217;s going on?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!1</p>

<p>To that, I&#8217;d reply with the following question:&nbsp; Why do you value immediacy over depth, accuracy, and understanding?&nbsp; Or, better yet, what difference will it make in your life to know about the Iranian election mess one day sooner?&nbsp; Will you be able to change anything?&nbsp; Help anyone?&nbsp; What will you and the world lose by waiting a few more hours?</p>

<p>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</p>

 <p>So why do I believe this increasing predilection towards immediacy is actually dangerous, and not just misguided?
</p><ul><li>It&#8217;s pressuring news media and politicians to report, respond, and act before they have all the facts, before they&#8217;ve had a chance to digest what is correct and what is right.&nbsp; While I doubt that people with access to nukes won&#8217;t be relying on twitter &#8220;reporting&#8221; to make that crucial decision, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if we start seeing more and more decisions painfully botched due to a reliance upon &#8220;what&#8217;s happening <em>right now</em>.&#8221;
<li>While there&#8217;s a chicken and egg scenario here, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if push towards &#8220;real time&#8221; is further feeding and exacerbating society&#8217;s collective ADD, dulling our interests and abilities in long-term thinking and planning.&nbsp; What are people reading?&nbsp; What are they thinking about?&nbsp; If, as we&#8217;ve noticed, fewer and fewer people (including me) are taking the time to write (and listen) beyond soundbites, what does this mean for the peaceful progress of our society?</ul><p>
Yes, I know I&#8217;m sounding like your grumpy neighbor who perhaps just got on the net (via dialup).&nbsp; No, I don&#8217;t think my griping alone will make a whit of difference.&nbsp; </p>

<p>But perhaps if enough people say, well, ENOUGH!... immediacy != value, then perhaps the tide will start turning.&nbsp; Not gonna hold my breath, though.</p>

<p>P.S.&#8212;I realize that there IS value in real time.&nbsp; In the case of disasters (natural and manmade), services like Twitter have helped with the mobilization of protests and rescue efforts and so on.&nbsp; So for the citizens of Iran, I have no doubt that tweets may well have served as valuable inspiration and coordination.&nbsp; But this is not news, this is broadcasting.&nbsp; And for the rest of the world, I stand by my assertions that there was little value in seeing a flurry of micro-messages about events happening in other places of the world except as&#8212;and I hate to label it as such&#8212;entertainment.&nbsp; But unsurprisingly the impulse to be entertained, to be un-bored&#8230; is now clearly more powerful than the desire to be patiently enlightened.
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>On public displays of affection&#8212;but not that kind</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.bladam.com/main/entry/public-commenting" />
      <id>tag:bladam.com,2009:main/index/1.2311</id>
      <published>2009-06-02T19:19:14Z</published>
      <updated>2009-06-02T19:30:15Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Adam</name>
            <email>adam-blog-asz@bladam.com</email>
            <uri>http://www.lasnik.net/</uri>      </author>

      <category term="society"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/society"
        label="society" />
      <category term="people&#45;and&#45;relationships"
        scheme="http://www.bladam.com/main/topic/people-and-relationships"
        label="people&#45;and&#45;relationships" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Today, we send and receive notes publicly in a way that seems shocking when viewed by communications standards just a decade ago. Expressions of friendship, social plans, etc. </p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;I miss you!&#8221;...<br />
&#8220;Hey, are you going to Fred&#8217;s party tomorrow?&#8221;...<br />
&#8220;Save me a dance this Wednesday!&#8221;... etc.</p></blockquote>

<p>Why do we like this, why do we post rather than e-mail? Bonding? Convenience? Insecurity? Is it just an extension of the old &#8220;You&#8217;re the greatest!&#8221; scribblings we got in our high school year books? <img src="http://www.bladam.com/expeng/images/smileys/smile.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="smile" style="border:0;" /></p>

<p>I feel torn about this. </p>

<p>On one hand, I must confess to being oft-delighted by both the chance to quickly share warm feelings or make arrangements with friends and acquaintances all over the world, many of whom I might not otherwise have a chance to more formally or personally converse with.&nbsp; But on the other hand, this almost seems like a narcissistic and lazy version of friendship, and a behavior that&#8217;s not particularly seemly in someone who is nearly four decades old.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m almost past feeling bad about not handwriting letters anymore.&nbsp; I still feel awful that I have unreplied-to e-mails in my inbox from dear friends that I&#8217;ve put off for &#8220;when I have time,&#8221; yet here I am writing a blog post.</p>

<p>Have we become a culture of relationship snackers?&nbsp; Has the ease of publishing, of communicating, of virtual hugging (not to mention cow-throwing) resulted in an exciting and perhaps overall-positive broadening of our social circle&#8230; but at the expense of deepening relationships?</p>

<p>What do you think?&nbsp; Why are we so drawn to this micro- and public communicating?&nbsp; What does it mean for us?&nbsp; What does it mean for relationships?
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>